BUS7B56 Professional Practice and Strategy Assignment
ASSIGNMENT FRONT SHEET
| Student Name: | |
| Certification : I certify that the whole of this work is the result of my individual effort and that all quotations from books, periodicals etc. have been acknowledged. | |
| Student Signature: | Date: |
| Student Registration Number: | |
| Student email address : |
| Programme : Business Undergraduate | Year/Level : 7 | |
| Academic Year : 2021/22 | Trimester : 2 | |
| Module title : Professional Practice and Strategy Implementation in the Context of Health Care Management | Assignment no. : 2 | |
| Module code: BUS7B56 | Word guide: 1500 +/-10% | |
| Percentage Weighting of this assignment for the module: 50% | ||
| Issue date : | Return date : | |
| Lecturer :Dr.Jill Newman | Second marker : | |
| Notes for students : 1. Electronic copy of assignment must be submitted through the Turnitin software. 2. This assignment will be marked electronically and results available online through Grademark in Turnitin within 3 weeks of the submission date. 3. 10% of marks are awarded for satisfactory use of language and/or good presentation. 4. 5% of marks are awarded for satisfactory referencing and/or presentation of a bibliography where either is required. Note that all referenced work should be obtained from credible sources. 5. Students should ensure that they comply with Glyndwr University’s plagiarism policy. 6. Students should make correct use of the Harvard referencing method. |
| Learning Outcomes Tested in this Assignment: LO1:Critically appraise relevant policies and clinical governance in clinical practice. L02: Justify approaches to strategy implementation considering resource implications. L03:Critically evaluate methods of determining quality in health and social care. |
There are lots of other guidelines which you have to know for your knowledge and one of them is Get BMP3004 World of Work Assignment Help Now
Would students please note that achievement of the learning outcomes for this assessment is demonstrated against the assessment criteria shown below (which are not necessarily weighted equally). All marks/grades remain indicative until they have been considered and confirmed by the Assessment Board
| Assessment Criteria | Marks Awarded | Marks Available | ||
| 1 | Critical Appraisal and Evaluation of mechanisms for strategy implementation | 45 | ||
| 2 | Contextual analysis and application to practice | 40 | ||
| 3 | Wide ranging references with the correct use of the Harvard system | 5 | ||
| 4 | Quality of the written work. Clear structure to the work and correct spelling was used throughout. | 10 | ||
| Additional Comments from Second marker or External Examiner (if required) : |
We have also others websites which provide assignment writing service and one of them is Diploma Assignment Help
Assessment
Critically analysis factors contributing to successful implementation of healthcare policy in practice.
Taking the policy you selected in assessment 1 review the implementation of this policy, suggesting ways of improving the implementation to achieve the outcomes. Demonstrate the role of evaluation in this strategy implementation, providing a critique of whether or not the policy implementation is delivering the intended outcomes.
Assignment 2 Guidelines- Submission Deadline 16:30hours 11th May 2023
This assignment is to be written in essay format.
Critically evaluate mechanisms available for the implementation of policy. Consider the implementation strategy suited to professional practice, taking into account theory from the module and the context of leadership, complexity, cultural and engagement within healthcare teams or professional groups. Identify and justify the choice of quality improvement methodology you would recommend for implementation of the policy you have selected.
In this assignment you will need to consider the strategic implementation plan in terms of its delivery, and how it is being monitored. You will also need to consider who will review it, how and when. Take into account the multi-level nature of evaluation. This assignment also requires you to think about the setting of KPIs, and the ability to change direction when needed (flexibility and agility). You will also need to consider what steps for evaluation need in place to ensure staff are engaged in the delivery evaluation process
This assignment must be supported by relevant academic theory.
While this assignment is weighted at 50%, your marks will be out of 100%
Please make sure that you correctly cite and reference all secondary sources you use and include a reference list. All referenced work should be obtained from credible sources such as academic journals and textbooks.
All written work must be in line with Harvard referencing.
Reference lists and any appendices/additional documents will not be included in your final word count.
Grading and marking Criteria –
Masters level Marking Criteria
| No work has been submitted in the time allowed, or the work submitted demonstrates little or no understanding of the task or the subject matter. This may be evident where the work is substantially incoherent, irrelevant or lacking in factual content, or where these shortcomings are present in combination such that the work as a whole is unsound. Major errors of fact, or evidence of substantially poor cognitive or other relevant skills will also lead to a fail. | Fail: Marks below 30% |
| The work shows some knowledge and required skills are present to a degree. There may be appreciable error or omission of facts, poor structure, misdirection to the task, or poor conceptualisation or illustration of the work. Evidence of analysis and evaluation is weak. There will be indications in the work that the candidate is capable of improving it by further application to the task | Fail: Marks in the range 30% – 39% |
| The work contains sufficient descriptive information. There is some analysis and explanation with appropriate illustration and example, and some attempt to evaluate. The work will generally be coherent and relevant, it will contain some useful proposals or solutions related to familiar solutions and there will be some attempt at originality. It will be communicated clearly. | Pass: Marks in the range of 40% – 49% |
| The work contains all the necessary contextual information. There will be adequate analysis, explanation and conceptualisation, with appropriate illustration and example, and sound attempts to evaluate and judge. The work will be substantially coherent and will contain relevant and feasible proposals or solutions related to familiar situations, some responses to uncertainty or ambiguity and some acknowledgements of the implications of change. | Pass: Marks in the range of 50% – 59% |
| The work will contain complete explanations using most available information. There will be substantial analysis; the ability to recognise evidence, use ideas, conceptualise, evaluate and judge in familiar situations will be clearly demonstrated. Proposals or solutions will be contextually relevant and useful, with substantial evidence of the skill necessary to operationalize them in a variety of situations, including those in which uncertainty, ambiguity or change are present. The work will provide evidence of originality and of useful knowledge transfer to novel situations. It will be coherent and convincing. | Pass: Marks in the range of 60% – 69% |
| The work will clearly demonstrate the ability to analyse accurately, reliably and fully, all relevant information; to use evidence; to conceptualise, evaluate and judge; to propose and operationalise effective solutions, and to show substantial originality and creativity in a variety of familiar situations or in the face of ambiguity, uncertainty or change. It will demonstrate valuable knowledge transfer and propose feasible solutions for a wide range of situations. Evidence of the ability to innovate will be present. | Pass: Marks in the range of 70% and above |